Skip to content

docs: remove TT SKY26b delivery date and mainnet schedule - #2

Open
dmitrii-f-t27 wants to merge 1 commit into
gHashTag:mainfrom
dmitrii-f-t27:fix/silicon-status
Open

docs: remove TT SKY26b delivery date and mainnet schedule#2
dmitrii-f-t27 wants to merge 1 commit into
gHashTag:mainfrom
dmitrii-f-t27:fix/silicon-status

Conversation

@dmitrii-f-t27

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This repo's last commit predates the TT SKY26b cancellation, so nothing swept it. Two public surfaces still state a hard delivery date and a hard hardware dependency for a chip that was never fabricated.

In a token and mining protocol a stated date reads as a schedule commitment, which makes this the highest-consequence stale claim of the set.

  • deployments/base-sepolia.md:51Mainnet deployment on Base L2 scheduled for Q2 2027 (post TT SKY26b silicon delivery, December 2026) → mainnet is not scheduled; it is gated on a silicon route; the order was cancelled and refunded; no route is currently selected.
  • README.md:8Mining requires a physical TT SKY26b Trinity chip → restated as a design requirement, with the plain statement that no such chip exists.

The No chip, no TRI. Period. line is kept — with the correction above it now reads as the constraint it is.

Source for the cancellation: trinity-papers-ru PR #18, merged 2026-07-31 — Кристаллы не изготавливались, маршрут отменён, средства возвращены. Corroborated by tri-net/README.md:29 (Trinity silicon — NO ROUTE — no die exists, none is scheduled) and trinity-s3ai/README.md:39.

The TT SKY26b shuttle order was cancelled and refunded in July 2026; no
Trinity die exists and none is scheduled. This repo has not been updated
since 2026-05-18, so it still states a chip delivery date and a mainnet
date derived from it. In a token/mining protocol repo those read as
schedule commitments.

deployments/base-sepolia.md:50 — "Mainnet deployment on Base L2 scheduled
  for Q2 2027 (post TT SKY26b silicon delivery, December 2026)" replaced
  with: mainnet is not scheduled, it is gated on a silicon route, the
  TT SKY26b order was cancelled and refunded, no route is selected.
README.md:8 — "Mining requires a physical TT SKY26b Trinity chip" restated
  as a design requirement, with the plain statement that no such chip
  exists and no fabrication route is currently selected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@dmitrii-f-t27

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@gHashTag — this is one of six PRs from a documentation and CI audit across the Trinity repos. Requesting your review here; I do not have permission to add you as a reviewer on this repo, hence the mention.

This one is the most time-sensitive of the set: the repo has not been touched since 2026-05-18, so it never saw the TT SKY26b cancellation. It still states a December 2026 delivery date and gates mining on a chip that was never fabricated. In a token protocol a stated date reads as a schedule commitment.

The full set:

Each PR body states what it does not fix as well as what it does. They are independent — merge or reject them separately.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant